By Staff Reporter The Fact: By instituting Dispute No.52 of 2014 under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short “MCS Act”), […]
Category: Land Mark Judgements
Managing Committee Members, Office Bearers Of Co-operative Housing Society not Public Servants: Bombay High Court
By Staff Reporter The Fact: The point of law is that all government servants are public servants, but all public servants are not government servants. […]
Society cannot be treated as an industry
By Staff Reporter The Fact of the Case: On 22 Aug 2018, Hon Bombay High Court delivered a historic judgement on society’s locus as “Industry”. […]
Revocation of power of attorney does not affect liability of Society/ Landlord and builder/developer towards consumers/buyers/allottee,
By Staff Reporter Section 79A Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 , and Section 17 of the Consumer Protection: The appellants – herein are the owners […]
Short Term Rentals allowed in Societies: Bombay High Court
By Staff Reporter The Bombay High Court recently addressed critical issues surrounding Airbnb operations in housing societies, delivering judgments that impact property owners and cooperative […]
It is compulsory for society to become promoter under RERA for redevelopment
By Staff Reporter On December 20, 2024, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT) issued a landmark judgment in the case of M/s. New Sangeeta […]
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chhattisgarh
- Delhi
- Goa
- GujaratCo-operative Society
- Haryana
- Jammu and Kashmir
- Land Mark Judgements
- Legal
- MaharashtraCo-operative Society
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Rajasthan Co-op. Soci.
- Society
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttarakhand
- West Bengal
One member, one Vote For Housing societies: Supreme Court
By SRELJ Bureau Can the bye-laws of a co-operative housing society cur – tail the voting rights of different members of a holding separate flats […]
No Confidence Motion rule against Office Bearer of Housing Society: Bombay High Court
By Legal Bureau The unamended section 73-ID indicated that the requisition for special meeting in response to a motion of no-confidence was required to be […]
Society cannot Terminate Development Agreement without MAHA RERA’s permission
By Legal Bureau Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Maha RERA) in a landmark order, protected home buyer’s money invested in redevelopment project and directed the […]
Majority wins in Housing Society Redevelopment : Bombay High Court
By N.P.G Nair Justice Sharukh Kathawalla, of Mumbai High Court decrees without any reservations that Disha Constructions, the assigned builder of Datta Ramanand Housing Society, Vile […]